Search a number
-
+
9253653041 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10001001111000111…
…11000101000110001
3212212220101021120102
420213203320220301
5122422413344131
64130121522145
7445212516203
oct104743705061
925786337512
109253653041
113a1949a546
121963043355
13b461a1659
1463ada2773
153925d31cb
hex2278f8a31

9253653041 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 9253653042. Its totient is φ = 9253653040.

The previous prime is 9253653029. The next prime is 9253653053. The reversal of 9253653041 is 1403563529.

It is a balanced prime because it is at equal distance from previous prime (9253653029) and next prime (9253653053).

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 7038538816 + 2215114225 = 83896^2 + 47065^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (1403563529) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 9253653041 - 214 = 9253636657 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 9253652986 and 9253653004.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (9253653001) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 4626826520 + 4626826521.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4626826521).

Almost surely, 29253653041 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

9253653041 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

9253653041 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

9253653041 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 97200, while the sum is 38.

The square root of 9253653041 is about 96195.9096895497. The cubic root of 9253653041 is about 2099.4445273853. Note that the first 3 decimals are identical.

The spelling of 9253653041 in words is "nine billion, two hundred fifty-three million, six hundred fifty-three thousand, forty-one".