Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011011111111… |
… | …11000001001001 |
3 | 20201111221001122 |
4 | 11233333001021 |
5 | 144143334334 |
6 | 13323325025 |
7 | 2250636656 |
oct | 557770111 |
9 | 221457048 |
10 | 96464969 |
11 | 4a4a7617 |
12 | 28380775 |
13 | 16ca6783 |
14 | cb50c2d |
15 | 870732e |
hex | 5bff049 |
96464969 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 96464970. Its totient is φ = 96464968.
The previous prime is 96464947. The next prime is 96465001. The reversal of 96464969 is 96946469.
It is a happy number.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 61418569 + 35046400 = 7837^2 + 5920^2 .
It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (96946469) is a distict prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-96464969 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×964649692 = 18610980488341922, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Chen prime.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 96464969.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (96464909) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 48232484 + 48232485.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (48232485).
Almost surely, 296464969 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
96464969 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
96464969 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
96464969 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The product of its digits is 2519424, while the sum is 53.
The square root of 96464969 is about 9821.6581593945. The cubic root of 96464969 is about 458.6237520575.
The spelling of 96464969 in words is "ninety-six million, four hundred sixty-four thousand, nine hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.090 sec. • engine limits •