Search a number
-
+
96478887469 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101100111011010010…
…1101111111000101101
3100020000210001021220111
41121312211233320231
53040042043344334
6112153301220021
76653560004206
oct1316645577055
9306023037814
1096478887469
1137a098a9148
1216846701611
1391371904c3
1449535685ad
15279a05c064
hex167696fe2d

96478887469 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 96478887470. Its totient is φ = 96478887468.

The previous prime is 96478887443. The next prime is 96478887503.

It is a happy number.

96478887469 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 58624515625 + 37854371844 = 242125^2 + 194562^2 .

It is a palprime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 96478887469 - 25 = 96478887437 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×964788874692 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 96478887395 and 96478887404.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (96478887419) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 48239443734 + 48239443735.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (48239443735).

Almost surely, 296478887469 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

96478887469 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

96478887469 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

96478887469 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 1170505728, while the sum is 76.

The spelling of 96478887469 in words is "ninety-six billion, four hundred seventy-eight million, eight hundred eighty-seven thousand, four hundred sixty-nine".