Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010011111110110… |
… | …00000000000000000 |
3 | 221122002112222011002 |
4 | 21033323000000000 |
5 | 130314241114102 |
6 | 4321231311132 |
7 | 501044263016 |
oct | 111773000000 |
9 | 27562488132 |
10 | 9930801152 |
11 | 4236750988 |
12 | 1b1197b4a8 |
13 | c2356c4cc |
14 | 6a2cac8b6 |
15 | 3d1c8e902 |
hex | 24fec0000 |
9930801152 has 76 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 20346529896. Its totient is φ = 4844421120.
The previous prime is 9930801131. The next prime is 9930801173. The reversal of 9930801152 is 2511080399.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (9930801131) and next prime (9930801173).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 11271752 + ... + 11272632.
Almost surely, 29930801152 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 9930801152, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (10173264948).
9930801152 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (10415728744).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9930801152 is an frugal number, since it uses more digits than its factorization.
9930801152 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 960 (or 926 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 19440, while the sum is 38.
The square root of 9930801152 is about 99653.4051199456. The cubic root of 9930801152 is about 2149.4537030628.
The spelling of 9930801152 in words is "nine billion, nine hundred thirty million, eight hundred one thousand, one hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •