Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010110101100110… |
… | …01101110101010000 |
3 | 222002210222101021020 |
4 | 21122303031311100 |
5 | 131203001410112 |
6 | 4351311155440 |
7 | 505421500620 |
oct | 113263156520 |
9 | 28083871236 |
10 | 10113310032 |
11 | 431a777571 |
12 | 1b62b15b80 |
13 | c52311327 |
14 | 6bd21a880 |
15 | 3e2ce148c |
hex | 25accdd50 |
10113310032 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 29858344896. Its totient is φ = 2889517056.
The previous prime is 10113310027. The next prime is 10113310043. The reversal of 10113310032 is 23001331101.
10113310032 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 10113309993 and 10113310020.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 15049233 + ... + 15049904.
Almost surely, 210113310032 is an apocalyptic number.
10113310032 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
10113310032 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (19745034864).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10113310032 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10113310032 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 30099155 (or 30099149 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 54, while the sum is 15.
Adding to 10113310032 its reverse (23001331101), we get a palindrome (33114641133).
The spelling of 10113310032 in words is "ten billion, one hundred thirteen million, three hundred ten thousand, thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •