Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101101011111011110… |
… | …11111011101101010010 |
3 | 10121111211221210111111110 |
4 | 32311331323323231102 |
5 | 113203000122042320 |
6 | 2100331334554150 |
7 | 133460022620061 |
oct | 16657573735522 |
9 | 3544757714443 |
10 | 1020020112210 |
11 | 363651841580 |
12 | 14582a808956 |
13 | 75258b95998 |
14 | 375252861d8 |
15 | 1b7ee1565e0 |
hex | ed7defbb52 |
1020020112210 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2710538588160. Its totient is φ = 243593625600.
The previous prime is 1020020112203. The next prime is 1020020112233. The reversal of 1020020112210 is 122110200201.
It is a Curzon number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 11504850 + ... + 11593170.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (21176082720).
Almost surely, 21020020112210 is an apocalyptic number.
1020020112210 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 1020020112210, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1355269294080).
1020020112210 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1690518475950).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1020020112210 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1020020112210 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 88864.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 16, while the sum is 12.
Adding to 1020020112210 its reverse (122110200201), we get a palindrome (1142130312411).
The spelling of 1020020112210 in words is "one trillion, twenty billion, twenty million, one hundred twelve thousand, two hundred ten".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.089 sec. • engine limits •