Search a number
-
+
102132212312101 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10111001110001110000010…
…001111000010100000100101
3111101121202002110221201112211
4113032032002033002200211
5101341313232322441401
61001114520212243421
730340544300563216
oct2716160217024045
9441552073851484
10102132212312101
112a5a70342a59a4
12b555aa7310571
1344cb045a0454a
141b313228d140d
15bc1a5e960951
hex5ce3823c2825

102132212312101 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 102132212312102. Its totient is φ = 102132212312100.

The previous prime is 102132212312099. The next prime is 102132212312183. The reversal of 102132212312101 is 101213212231201.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 86428816824100 + 15703395488001 = 9296710^2 + 3962751^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 102132212312101 - 21 = 102132212312099 is a prime.

Together with 102132212312099, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (102132212310101) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 51066106156050 + 51066106156051.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (51066106156051).

Almost surely, 2102132212312101 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

102132212312101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

102132212312101 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

102132212312101 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 288, while the sum is 22.

Adding to 102132212312101 its reverse (101213212231201), we get a palindrome (203345424543302).

The spelling of 102132212312101 in words is "one hundred two trillion, one hundred thirty-two billion, two hundred twelve million, three hundred twelve thousand, one hundred one".