Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11110101010100000111… |
… | …01100101010000000000 |
3 | 10201201120101010010222022 |
4 | 33111100131211100000 |
5 | 114230301412411202 |
6 | 2124005215101012 |
7 | 136056416022521 |
oct | 17252035452000 |
9 | 3651511103868 |
10 | 1053616919552 |
11 | 37692231315a |
12 | 150246211768 |
13 | 78481490942 |
14 | 38dd128c848 |
15 | 1c618910ea2 |
hex | f550765400 |
1053616919552 has 88 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2238338494080. Its totient is φ = 493987921920.
The previous prime is 1053616919479. The next prime is 1053616919573. The reversal of 1053616919552 is 2559196163501.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×10536169195522 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1053616919494 and 1053616919503.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4605899 + ... + 4829237.
Almost surely, 21053616919552 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 1053616919552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1119169247040).
1053616919552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1184721574528).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1053616919552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1053616919552 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 223647 (or 223629 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2187000, while the sum is 53.
The spelling of 1053616919552 in words is "one trillion, fifty-three billion, six hundred sixteen million, nine hundred nineteen thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.062 sec. • engine limits •