Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000101111000110001… |
… | …0110000100110010000 |
3 | 112100101102110102221200 |
4 | 2023301202300212100 |
5 | 4424331303342242 |
6 | 152540231151200 |
7 | 13562104035642 |
oct | 2136142604620 |
9 | 470342412850 |
10 | 150081309072 |
11 | 58715a93932 |
12 | 25105b15500 |
13 | 111ca37a636 |
14 | 739a4b8892 |
15 | 3d85ce104c |
hex | 22f18b0990 |
150081309072 has 60 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 423040996560. Its totient is φ = 49667189184.
The previous prime is 150081309023. The next prime is 150081309109. The reversal of 150081309072 is 270903180051.
150081309072 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 500 + 81 + 3 + 0 + 9 + 0 + 72 = 666.
150081309072 is digitally balanced in base 7, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3729018 + ... + 3769049.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7050683276).
Almost surely, 2150081309072 is an apocalyptic number.
150081309072 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
150081309072 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (272959687488).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
150081309072 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
150081309072 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 7498220 (or 7498211 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 15120, while the sum is 36.
The spelling of 150081309072 in words is "one hundred fifty billion, eighty-one million, three hundred nine thousand, seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •