Search a number
-
+
201210111001201 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101101101111111111100001…
…001100010000001001110001
3222101102111110120222020200211
4231233333201030100021301
5202333111301404014301
61551534352055544121
760244644060154261
oct5557774114201161
9871374416866624
10201210111001201
115912580213a285
121a697a4b08b041
13883705555a023
14379889ad277a1
15183de0b762051
hexb6ffe1310271

201210111001201 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 201210111001202. Its totient is φ = 201210111001200.

The previous prime is 201210111001183. The next prime is 201210111001219. The reversal of 201210111001201 is 102100111012102.

It is a happy number.

It is a balanced prime because it is at equal distance from previous prime (201210111001183) and next prime (201210111001219).

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 121330775750625 + 79879335250576 = 11015025^2 + 8937524^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 201210111001201 - 211 = 201210110999153 is a prime.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (201210111007201) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 100605055500600 + 100605055500601.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (100605055500601).

Almost surely, 2201210111001201 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

201210111001201 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

201210111001201 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

201210111001201 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8, while the sum is 13.

Adding to 201210111001201 its reverse (102100111012102), we get a palindrome (303310222013303).

The spelling of 201210111001201 in words is "two hundred one trillion, two hundred ten billion, one hundred eleven million, one thousand, two hundred one".