Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011100001111100… |
… | …111111100010001000 |
3 | 2211022010121102202200 |
4 | 123201330333202020 |
5 | 441020012304443 |
6 | 21325135400200 |
7 | 2064353342301 |
oct | 334174774210 |
9 | 84263542680 |
10 | 29560666248 |
11 | 1159a253093 |
12 | 588b983060 |
13 | 2a313612b9 |
14 | 1605d657a8 |
15 | b80295dd3 |
hex | 6e1f3f888 |
29560666248 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 80073427200. Its totient is φ = 9851919840.
The previous prime is 29560666243. The next prime is 29560666253. The reversal of 29560666248 is 84266606592.
It is a happy number.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (29560666243) and next prime (29560666253).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 29560666194 and 29560666203.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (29560666243) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 450153 + ... + 511623.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1668196400).
Almost surely, 229560666248 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
29560666248 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (50512760952).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
29560666248 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
29560666248 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 68162 (or 68155 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7464960, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 29560666248 in words is "twenty-nine billion, five hundred sixty million, six hundred sixty-six thousand, two hundred forty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •