Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11100001101010011… |
… | …110101100000000000 |
3 | 2220011211100121122101 |
4 | 130031103311200000 |
5 | 444012221343002 |
6 | 21525242320144 |
7 | 2121365246635 |
oct | 341523654000 |
9 | 86154317571 |
10 | 30288074752 |
11 | 11932912941 |
12 | 5a534b9054 |
13 | 2b18c78c30 |
14 | 16747d618c |
15 | bc407e587 |
hex | 70d4f5800 |
30288074752 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 69057424800. Its totient is φ = 13156614144.
The previous prime is 30288074711. The next prime is 30288074753. The reversal of 30288074752 is 25747088203.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30288074753) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 419149 + ... + 486067.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (719348175).
Almost surely, 230288074752 is an apocalyptic number.
30288074752 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (32) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 30288074752, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (34528712400).
30288074752 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (38769350048).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
30288074752 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30288074752 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 66971 (or 66951 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 752640, while the sum is 46.
The spelling of 30288074752 in words is "thirty billion, two hundred eighty-eight million, seventy-four thousand, seven hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •