Search a number
-
+
34331189 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000001011110…
…1101000110101
32101121012112112
42002331220311
532242044224
63223500405
7564544634
oct202755065
971535475
1034331189
1118419592
12b5b7705
137160519
1447b951b
15303230e
hex20bda35

34331189 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 34331190. Its totient is φ = 34331188.

The previous prime is 34331183. The next prime is 34331191. The reversal of 34331189 is 98113343.

It is a happy number.

34331189 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 18130564 + 16200625 = 4258^2 + 4025^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (98113343) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 34331189 - 224 = 17553973 is a prime.

Together with 34331191, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (34331183) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 17165594 + 17165595.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17165595).

Almost surely, 234331189 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

34331189 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

34331189 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

34331189 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 7776, while the sum is 32.

The square root of 34331189 is about 5859.2822939333. The cubic root of 34331189 is about 325.0096691403.

The spelling of 34331189 in words is "thirty-four million, three hundred thirty-one thousand, one hundred eighty-nine".