Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001110101… |
… | …0010011001110 |
3 | 2200211120222120 |
4 | 2103222103032 |
5 | 34402132210 |
6 | 3501353410 |
7 | 650005365 |
oct | 223522316 |
9 | 80746876 |
10 | 38708430 |
11 | 1a939242 |
12 | 10b68866 |
13 | 80339c7 |
14 | 51d87dc |
15 | 35e9270 |
hex | 24ea4ce |
38708430 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 93809664. Its totient is φ = 10221216.
The previous prime is 38708413. The next prime is 38708437. The reversal of 38708430 is 3480783.
38708430 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 38708391 and 38708400.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (38708437) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3174 + ... + 9353.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2931552).
Almost surely, 238708430 is an apocalyptic number.
38708430 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (30) formed by its first and last digit.
38708430 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (55101234).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
38708430 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
38708430 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 12640.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 16128, while the sum is 33.
The square root of 38708430 is about 6221.6099202698. The cubic root of 38708430 is about 338.2739221772.
The spelling of 38708430 in words is "thirty-eight million, seven hundred eight thousand, four hundred thirty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •