Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101010111010000… |
… | …010011101001110000 |
3 | 11122201120200211202010 |
4 | 231113100103221300 |
5 | 1244223341022343 |
6 | 34213144522520 |
7 | 3343020461253 |
oct | 552720235160 |
9 | 148646624663 |
10 | 48708532848 |
11 | 19725773728 |
12 | 9534480440 |
13 | 4793331891 |
14 | 2500dd109a |
15 | 14012dcd33 |
hex | b57413a70 |
48708532848 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 134267636480. Its totient is φ = 15170913792.
The previous prime is 48708532837. The next prime is 48708532891. The reversal of 48708532848 is 84823580784.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×487085328482 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (57).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 299236 + ... + 432387.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1678345456).
Almost surely, 248708532848 is an apocalyptic number.
48708532848 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (48) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
48708532848 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (85559103632).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
48708532848 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
48708532848 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 731726 (or 731720 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 13762560, while the sum is 57.
The spelling of 48708532848 in words is "forty-eight billion, seven hundred eight million, five hundred thirty-two thousand, eight hundred forty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •