Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011111111111… |
… | …1011111010000 |
3 | 10111201000011111 |
4 | 2333333133100 |
5 | 100341021202 |
6 | 4554423104 |
7 | 1150536250 |
oct | 277773720 |
9 | 114630144 |
10 | 50329552 |
11 | 26456379 |
12 | 14a31a94 |
13 | a572400 |
14 | 6981960 |
15 | 46426d7 |
hex | 2fff7d0 |
50329552 has 60 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 120721440. Its totient is φ = 19903104.
The previous prime is 50329549. The next prime is 50329561. The reversal of 50329552 is 25592305.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 17599 + ... + 20257.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2012024).
Almost surely, 250329552 is an apocalyptic number.
50329552 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (52) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 50329552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (60360720).
50329552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (70391888).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
50329552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
50329552 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2700 (or 2681 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 13500, while the sum is 31.
The square root of 50329552 is about 7094.3323857851. The cubic root of 50329552 is about 369.2107647460.
The spelling of 50329552 in words is "fifty million, three hundred twenty-nine thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •