Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100000001011… |
… | …1000101111011 |
3 | 10111212220210100 |
4 | 3000113011323 |
5 | 100402114420 |
6 | 5000450443 |
7 | 1151421156 |
oct | 300270573 |
9 | 114786710 |
10 | 50426235 |
11 | 26511a82 |
12 | 14a79a23 |
13 | a5a7412 |
14 | 69a8c9d |
15 | 4661190 |
hex | 301717b |
50426235 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 92461824. Its totient is φ = 25371456.
The previous prime is 50426203. The next prime is 50426237. The reversal of 50426235 is 53262405.
50426235 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 0 + 426 + 235 = 666.
50426235 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 50426235 - 25 = 50426203 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 50426199 and 50426208.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (50426237) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 85612 + ... + 86198.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1926288).
Almost surely, 250426235 is an apocalyptic number.
50426235 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (42035589).
50426235 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
50426235 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 704 (or 701 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7200, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 50426235 is about 7101.1432178206. The cubic root of 50426235 is about 369.4470313113.
The spelling of 50426235 in words is "fifty million, four hundred twenty-six thousand, two hundred thirty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •