Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100000111111101… |
… | …01111000001111000 |
3 | 121210122021001101011 |
4 | 12003332233001320 |
5 | 101312330300102 |
6 | 2553523203304 |
7 | 320206345360 |
oct | 60376570170 |
9 | 17718231334 |
10 | 6509228152 |
11 | 28403204a9 |
12 | 1317b16534 |
13 | 7c97322bb |
14 | 45a6c79a0 |
15 | 2816c52d7 |
hex | 183faf078 |
6509228152 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 14302033920. Its totient is φ = 2719408128.
The previous prime is 6509228149. The next prime is 6509228179. The reversal of 6509228152 is 2518229056.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×65092281522 = 84740102269578670208, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 671613 + ... + 681235.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (223469280).
Almost surely, 26509228152 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 6509228152, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (7151016960).
6509228152 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (7792805768).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
6509228152 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
6509228152 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 9940 (or 9936 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 86400, while the sum is 40.
The square root of 6509228152 is about 80679.7877538111. The cubic root of 6509228152 is about 1867.1383448914.
The spelling of 6509228152 in words is "six billion, five hundred nine million, two hundred twenty-eight thousand, one hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •