Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100000110100111000… |
… | …0000000000000000000 |
3 | 20201221211021100010201 |
4 | 1001221300000000000 |
5 | 2123332334323303 |
6 | 52215003534544 |
7 | 5043620200000 |
oct | 1015160000000 |
9 | 221854240121 |
10 | 70493667328 |
11 | 279949236a7 |
12 | 117b422a454 |
13 | 68557c31b6 |
14 | 35aa400000 |
15 | 1c78b2781d |
hex | 1069c00000 |
70493667328 has 138 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 164483806056. Its totient is φ = 30211571712.
The previous prime is 70493667271. The next prime is 70493667331. The reversal of 70493667328 is 82376639407.
It is a powerful number, because all its prime factors have an exponent greater than 1 and also an Achilles number because it is not a perfect power.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (7) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 10070523901 + ... + 10070523907.
Almost surely, 270493667328 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 70493667328, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (82241903028).
70493667328 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (93990138728).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
70493667328 is an frugal number, since it uses more digits than its factorization.
70493667328 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 79 (or 9 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9144576, while the sum is 55.
The spelling of 70493667328 in words is "seventy billion, four hundred ninety-three million, six hundred sixty-seven thousand, three hundred twenty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •