Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011100001110… |
… | …01000001010001 |
3 | 20201221222221202 |
4 | 11300321001101 |
5 | 144223440140 |
6 | 13332400545 |
7 | 2252646422 |
oct | 560710121 |
9 | 221858852 |
10 | 96702545 |
11 | 4a64a065 |
12 | 28476155 |
13 | 1705a954 |
14 | cbb3649 |
15 | 8752915 |
hex | 5c39051 |
96702545 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 122869224. Its totient is φ = 72811264.
The previous prime is 96702539. The next prime is 96702577. The reversal of 96702545 is 54520769.
It is a happy number.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 8116801 + 88585744 = 2849^2 + 9412^2 .
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 96702545 - 218 = 96440401 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 96702499 and 96702508.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 568754 + ... + 568923.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15358653).
Almost surely, 296702545 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
96702545 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (26166679).
96702545 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
96702545 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1137699.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 75600, while the sum is 38.
The square root of 96702545 is about 9833.7452173625. The cubic root of 96702545 is about 458.9999462062. Note that the first 4 decimals are identical.
The spelling of 96702545 in words is "ninety-six million, seven hundred two thousand, five hundred forty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •