Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010110111001111… |
… | …01100011000011100 |
3 | 222010202212021210200 |
4 | 21123213230120130 |
5 | 131220012113102 |
6 | 4352522103500 |
7 | 505646434443 |
oct | 113347543034 |
9 | 28122767720 |
10 | 10127066652 |
11 | 432751307a |
12 | 1b6764ab90 |
13 | c55119a41 |
14 | 6c0d9bd5a |
15 | 3e410c51c |
hex | 25b9ec61c |
10127066652 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 26970325200. Its totient is φ = 3195168768.
The previous prime is 10127066627. The next prime is 10127066689. The reversal of 10127066652 is 25666072101.
It is a happy number.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 840124 + ... + 852092.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (374587850).
Almost surely, 210127066652 is an apocalyptic number.
10127066652 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 10127066652, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (13485162600).
10127066652 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (16843258548).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10127066652 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10127066652 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 13235 (or 13230 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 30240, while the sum is 36.
The spelling of 10127066652 in words is "ten billion, one hundred twenty-seven million, sixty-six thousand, six hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •