Search a number
-
+
1030104421 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin111101011001100…
…010010101100101
32122210022201121121
4331121202111211
54102201320141
6250114413541
734345512613
oct7531422545
92583281547
101030104421
11489515775
12248b912b1
1313554a858
149ab466b3
156067b1d1
hex3d662565

1030104421 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1030104422. Its totient is φ = 1030104420.

The previous prime is 1030104419. The next prime is 1030104469. The reversal of 1030104421 is 1244010301.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 906672321 + 123432100 = 30111^2 + 11110^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 1030104421 - 21 = 1030104419 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×10301044212 = 2122230236327490482, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 1030104419, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1030104395 and 1030104404.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1030104821) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 515052210 + 515052211.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (515052211).

Almost surely, 21030104421 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1030104421 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1030104421 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1030104421 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 96, while the sum is 16.

The square root of 1030104421 is about 32095.2398495478. The cubic root of 1030104421 is about 1009.9357607086.

Adding to 1030104421 its reverse (1244010301), we get a palindrome (2274114722).

The spelling of 1030104421 in words is "one billion, thirty million, one hundred four thousand, four hundred twenty-one".