Search a number
-
+
10741021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101000111110…
…010100011101
3202012200220121
4220332110131
510222203041
61022114541
7160203634
oct50762435
922180817
1010741021
116076985
12371ba51
1322c0c45
1415d851b
15e227d1
hexa3e51d

10741021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 10741022. Its totient is φ = 10741020.

The previous prime is 10741019. The next prime is 10741037. The reversal of 10741021 is 12014701.

It is an a-pointer prime, because the next prime (10741037) can be obtained adding 10741021 to its sum of digits (16).

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 10304100 + 436921 = 3210^2 + 661^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 10741021 - 21 = 10741019 is a prime.

Together with 10741019, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 10740986 and 10741004.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (10741091) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5370510 + 5370511.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5370511).

Almost surely, 210741021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

10741021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

10741021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

10741021 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 56, while the sum is 16.

The square root of 10741021 is about 3277.3496914428. The cubic root of 10741021 is about 220.6387839510.

Adding to 10741021 its reverse (12014701), we get a palindrome (22755722).

The spelling of 10741021 in words is "ten million, seven hundred forty-one thousand, twenty-one".