Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101000101110… |
… | …01100011110000 |
3 | 21122122000200100 |
4 | 12202321203300 |
5 | 211102440302 |
6 | 14521352400 |
7 | 2502246315 |
oct | 642714360 |
9 | 248560610 |
10 | 109811952 |
11 | 56a93388 |
12 | 30938700 |
13 | 1999a8b3 |
14 | 10826d0c |
15 | 9991d1c |
hex | 68b98f0 |
109811952 has 30 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 307321352. Its totient is φ = 36603936.
The previous prime is 109811927. The next prime is 109811953. The reversal of 109811952 is 259118901.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (36) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (109811953) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 381148 + ... + 381435.
Almost surely, 2109811952 is an apocalyptic number.
109811952 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
109811952 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (197509400).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
109811952 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
109811952 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 762597 (or 762588 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 6480, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 109811952 is about 10479.1198103658. The cubic root of 109811952 is about 478.8687945405.
The spelling of 109811952 in words is "one hundred nine million, eight hundred eleven thousand, nine hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.636 sec. • engine limits •