Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000011001011110011… |
… | …011000001001101001000 |
3 | 10222201122012101021011010 |
4 | 100121132123001031020 |
5 | 121430310041311210 |
6 | 2221401440003520 |
7 | 144261531220221 |
oct | 20313633011510 |
9 | 3881565337133 |
10 | 1126865572680 |
11 | 3a49a0269421 |
12 | 1624890005a0 |
13 | 82355980143 |
14 | 3c77d516248 |
15 | 1e4a4330920 |
hex | 1065e6c1348 |
1126865572680 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 3400839872640. Its totient is φ = 298698094592.
The previous prime is 1126865572627. The next prime is 1126865572697. The reversal of 1126865572680 is 862755686211.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 1126865572680.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 28095369 + ... + 28135448.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (53138123010).
Almost surely, 21126865572680 is an apocalyptic number.
1126865572680 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
1126865572680 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2273974299960).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1126865572680 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1126865572680 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 56230998 (or 56230994 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9676800, while the sum is 57.
The spelling of 1126865572680 in words is "one trillion, one hundred twenty-six billion, eight hundred sixty-five million, five hundred seventy-two thousand, six hundred eighty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •