Search a number
-
+
13234222034141 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1100000010010101010100…
…0110100110110011011101
31201212011211200120200011212
43000211111012212303131
53213312141320043031
644051415003354205
72534066234135603
oct300452506466335
951764750520155
1013234222034141
114242669360739
121598a6a222965
1374cc9bc91624
1433a77b181873
1517e3bc21812b
hexc09551a6cdd

13234222034141 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 13234222034142. Its totient is φ = 13234222034140.

The previous prime is 13234222034119. The next prime is 13234222034149. The reversal of 13234222034141 is 14143022243231.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 6718225538116 + 6515996496025 = 2591954^2 + 2552645^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-13234222034141 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 13234222034098 and 13234222034107.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (13234222034149) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 6617111017070 + 6617111017071.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (6617111017071).

Almost surely, 213234222034141 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

13234222034141 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

13234222034141 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

13234222034141 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 27648, while the sum is 32.

Adding to 13234222034141 its reverse (14143022243231), we get a palindrome (27377244277372).

The spelling of 13234222034141 in words is "thirteen trillion, two hundred thirty-four billion, two hundred twenty-two million, thirty-four thousand, one hundred forty-one".