Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11110001011101101… |
… | …00011011110111000 |
3 | 1112211022021110200020 |
4 | 33011312203132320 |
5 | 231141301031202 |
6 | 11235534410440 |
7 | 1112362254366 |
oct | 170566433670 |
9 | 45738243606 |
10 | 16204314552 |
11 | 6965a053a8 |
12 | 3182960a20 |
13 | 16b31c130a |
14 | ada158636 |
15 | 64c9035bc |
hex | 3c5da37b8 |
16204314552 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 41307356160. Its totient is φ = 5295388800.
The previous prime is 16204314551. The next prime is 16204314569. The reversal of 16204314552 is 25541340261.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (16204314551) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1917777 + ... + 1926207.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (645427440).
Almost surely, 216204314552 is an apocalyptic number.
16204314552 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 16204314552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (20653678080).
16204314552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (25103041608).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
16204314552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
16204314552 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 10004 (or 10000 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 28800, while the sum is 33.
The spelling of 16204314552 in words is "sixteen billion, two hundred four million, three hundred fourteen thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.092 sec. • engine limits •