Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101001000110100… |
… | …1111111100010111010 |
3 | 201010021012020111220210 |
4 | 2322101221333202322 |
5 | 11234111110400442 |
6 | 231515003331550 |
7 | 20310326435610 |
oct | 2722151774272 |
9 | 633235214823 |
10 | 200012200122 |
11 | 77908744349 |
12 | 3291b820bb6 |
13 | 15b26a01297 |
14 | 99759796b0 |
15 | 530958419c |
hex | 2e91a7f8ba |
200012200122 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 504000921600. Its totient is φ = 51653581056.
The previous prime is 200012200103. The next prime is 200012200127. The reversal of 200012200122 is 221002210002.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 200012200098 and 200012200107.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (200012200127) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1240704 + ... + 1392612.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3937507200).
Almost surely, 2200012200122 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 200012200122, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (252000460800).
200012200122 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (303988721478).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
200012200122 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200012200122 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 152020.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 32, while the sum is 12.
Adding to 200012200122 its reverse (221002210002), we get a palindrome (421014410124).
The spelling of 200012200122 in words is "two hundred billion, twelve million, two hundred thousand, one hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •