Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101010010010110010… |
… | …011001011111011010000 |
3 | 21010101210012120100210210 |
4 | 131102112103023323100 |
5 | 230433213433302022 |
6 | 4140321000324120 |
7 | 265255161230136 |
oct | 35222623137320 |
9 | 7111705510723 |
10 | 2012566306512 |
11 | 706585237973 |
12 | 286070473640 |
13 | 117a26b285b8 |
14 | 6d5a17a3756 |
15 | 37541312a0c |
hex | 1d4964cbed0 |
2012566306512 has 160 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 5528453299200. Its totient is φ = 629086334976.
The previous prime is 2012566306469. The next prime is 2012566306523. The reversal of 2012566306512 is 2156036652102.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×20125663065122 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 300873664 + ... + 300880352.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (34552833120).
Almost surely, 22012566306512 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 2012566306512, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (2764226649600).
2012566306512 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (3515886992688).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
2012566306512 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
2012566306512 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 10025 (or 10019 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 129600, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 2012566306512 in words is "two trillion, twelve billion, five hundred sixty-six million, three hundred six thousand, five hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.090 sec. • engine limits •