Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100110011110011001… |
… | …1010101101010110000 |
3 | 210001000121011011221210 |
4 | 3030330303111222300 |
5 | 12101142214020102 |
6 | 245032402520120 |
7 | 21620243143026 |
oct | 3147463255260 |
9 | 701017134853 |
10 | 220063423152 |
11 | 85368079a51 |
12 | 36796966040 |
13 | 179a0ba1bb1 |
14 | a918996716 |
15 | 5acea6c36c |
hex | 333ccd5ab0 |
220063423152 has 160 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 586922434560. Its totient is φ = 71020396800.
The previous prime is 220063423147. The next prime is 220063423159. The reversal of 220063423152 is 251324360022.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (220063423159) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 86264277 + ... + 86266827.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3668265216).
Almost surely, 2220063423152 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 220063423152, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (293461217280).
220063423152 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (366859011408).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
220063423152 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
220063423152 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 3071 (or 3065 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 17280, while the sum is 30.
Adding to 220063423152 its reverse (251324360022), we get a palindrome (471387783174).
The spelling of 220063423152 in words is "two hundred twenty billion, sixty-three million, four hundred twenty-three thousand, one hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •