Search a number
-
+
22324104424031 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010001001101101111000…
…10100000110101001011111
32221001011102012221222220112
411010312330110012221133
510411224231213032111
6115251315121440235
74462602055462124
oct504667424065137
987034365858815
1022324104424031
117127665a60713
1226066894a007b
13c5c2004a53b7
145726c72ac74b
1528aa7b78de8b
hex144dbc506a5f

22324104424031 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 22324104424032. Its totient is φ = 22324104424030.

The previous prime is 22324104423997. The next prime is 22324104424079. The reversal of 22324104424031 is 13042440142322.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-22324104424031 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×223241044240313 (a number of 41 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (22324104424631) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 11162052212015 + 11162052212016.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (11162052212016).

Almost surely, 222324104424031 is an apocalyptic number.

22324104424031 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

22324104424031 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

22324104424031 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 36864, while the sum is 32.

Adding to 22324104424031 its reverse (13042440142322), we get a palindrome (35366544566353).

The spelling of 22324104424031 in words is "twenty-two trillion, three hundred twenty-four billion, one hundred four million, four hundred twenty-four thousand, thirty-one".