Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11001010100100001… |
… | …010010110001010000 |
3 | 2121011202200020021122 |
4 | 121110201102301100 |
5 | 421140040130202 |
6 | 20253453141412 |
7 | 1651511431130 |
oct | 312441226120 |
9 | 77152606248 |
10 | 27187817552 |
11 | 105918a5805 |
12 | 532918a868 |
13 | 2743890b0c |
14 | 145cb72ac0 |
15 | a91cd49a2 |
hex | 654852c50 |
27187817552 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 63299377152. Its totient is φ = 11060100480.
The previous prime is 27187817543. The next prime is 27187817557. The reversal of 27187817552 is 25571878172.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 27187817494 and 27187817503.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (27187817557) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 297173 + ... + 377739.
Almost surely, 227187817552 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 27187817552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (31649688576).
27187817552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (36111559600).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
27187817552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
27187817552 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 80736 (or 80730 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 2195200, while the sum is 53.
The spelling of 27187817552 in words is "twenty-seven billion, one hundred eighty-seven million, eight hundred seventeen thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •