Search a number
-
+
3212234322181 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101110101111101000000…
…101011111000100000101
3102101002100010120220220021
4232233220011133010011
5410112123441302211
610455402521335141
7451035106141633
oct56575005370405
912332303526807
103212234322181
111029334594245
1243a6769374b1
131a3bb26c7271
14b1689b90353
1558856cc2771
hex2ebe815f105

3212234322181 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3212234322182. Its totient is φ = 3212234322180.

The previous prime is 3212234322109. The next prime is 3212234322197. The reversal of 3212234322181 is 1812234322123.

It is a happy number.

3212234322181 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2111182846081 + 1101051476100 = 1452991^2 + 1049310^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3212234322181 - 211 = 3212234320133 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×32122343221812 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3212234302181) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1606117161090 + 1606117161091.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1606117161091).

Almost surely, 23212234322181 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3212234322181 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3212234322181 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3212234322181 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 27648, while the sum is 34.

The spelling of 3212234322181 in words is "three trillion, two hundred twelve billion, two hundred thirty-four million, three hundred twenty-two thousand, one hundred eighty-one".