Search a number
-
+
3324240421 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1100011000100011…
…1110001000100101
322120200010220120121
43012020332020211
523302001143141
61305510001541
7145243402015
oct30610761045
98520126517
103324240421
1114564a1037
127893462b1
1340c91b888
142376c9c45
15146c901d1
hexc623e225

3324240421 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3324240422. Its totient is φ = 3324240420.

The previous prime is 3324240379. The next prime is 3324240433. The reversal of 3324240421 is 1240424233.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1798947396 + 1525293025 = 42414^2 + 39055^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (1240424233) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3324240421 - 223 = 3315851813 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×33242404212 = 22101148753220514482, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3324240721) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1662120210 + 1662120211.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1662120211).

Almost surely, 23324240421 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3324240421 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3324240421 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3324240421 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4608, while the sum is 25.

The square root of 3324240421 is about 57656.2262119192. The cubic root of 3324240421 is about 1492.4420445366.

Adding to 3324240421 its reverse (1240424233), we get a palindrome (4564664654).

The spelling of 3324240421 in words is "three billion, three hundred twenty-four million, two hundred forty thousand, four hundred twenty-one".