Search a number
-
+
3379369421 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1100100101101101…
…0001010111001101
322201111212202100102
43021123101113031
523410104310141
61315155340445
7146513110661
oct31133212715
98644782312
103379369421
11148462529a
127a38b1725
1341b18169c
14240b5a8a1
1514ba2e99b
hexc96d15cd

3379369421 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3379369422. Its totient is φ = 3379369420.

The previous prime is 3379369349. The next prime is 3379369423. The reversal of 3379369421 is 1249639733.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1781768521 + 1597600900 = 42211^2 + 39970^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-3379369421 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×33793694212 = 22840275367179750482, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 3379369423, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3379369423) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1689684710 + 1689684711.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1689684711).

Almost surely, 23379369421 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3379369421 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3379369421 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3379369421 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 734832, while the sum is 47.

The square root of 3379369421 is about 58132.3440177669. The cubic root of 3379369421 is about 1500.6470424802.

The spelling of 3379369421 in words is "three billion, three hundred seventy-nine million, three hundred sixty-nine thousand, four hundred twenty-one".