Search a number
-
+
41450425229 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100110100110101000…
…110100101110001101
310221222202021202212102
4212212220310232031
51134342302101404
631013030244445
72665115541533
oct464650645615
9127882252772
1041450425229
1116640758a84
1280497b6725
133ba7707b45
142013088153
151128edc71e
hex9a6a34b8d

41450425229 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 41450425230. Its totient is φ = 41450425228.

The previous prime is 41450425201. The next prime is 41450425241. The reversal of 41450425229 is 92252405414.

It is a happy number.

41450425229 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 37172611204 + 4277814025 = 192802^2 + 65405^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-41450425229 is a prime.

It is a super-4 number, since 4×414504252294 (a number of 44 digits) contains 4444 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 41450425192 and 41450425201.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (41450425529) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 20725212614 + 20725212615.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (20725212615).

Almost surely, 241450425229 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

41450425229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

41450425229 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

41450425229 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 115200, while the sum is 38.

The spelling of 41450425229 in words is "forty-one billion, four hundred fifty million, four hundred twenty-five thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".