Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100010010010110001… |
… | …10000000100001101000 |
3 | 1111100200112001102200120 |
4 | 12021023012000201220 |
5 | 23404044131124344 |
6 | 521535104403240 |
7 | 42333453261330 |
oct | 6111306004150 |
9 | 1440615042616 |
10 | 422166661224 |
11 | 153049090030 |
12 | 6999a916520 |
13 | 30a6bb73a29 |
14 | 1660c1280c0 |
15 | aeac998219 |
hex | 624b180868 |
422166661224 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1315844144640. Its totient is φ = 109653677760.
The previous prime is 422166661219. The next prime is 422166661249.
422166661224 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (42).
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 114220734 + ... + 114224429.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (20560064760).
Almost surely, 2422166661224 is an apocalyptic number.
422166661224 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (44) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
422166661224 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (893677483416).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
422166661224 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
422166661224 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 228445190 (or 228445186 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 331776, while the sum is 42.
The spelling of 422166661224 in words is "four hundred twenty-two billion, one hundred sixty-six million, six hundred sixty-one thousand, two hundred twenty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •