Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100111010100110111… |
… | …110010111101101101 |
3 | 11000222210212020112100 |
4 | 213110313302331231 |
5 | 1142434340232000 |
6 | 31222015525313 |
7 | 3023254642314 |
oct | 472467627555 |
9 | 130883766470 |
10 | 42226102125 |
11 | 169a9596569 |
12 | 8225529839 |
13 | 3c9c32295c |
14 | 20880c127b |
15 | 117215ca00 |
hex | 9d4df2f6d |
42226102125 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 78201497088. Its totient is φ = 21908880000.
The previous prime is 42226102097. The next prime is 42226102141. The reversal of 42226102125 is 52120162224.
42226102125 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 610 + 21 + 25 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 42226102125 - 29 = 42226101613 is a prime.
It is a Curzon number.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 13108015 + ... + 13111235.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (814598928).
Almost surely, 242226102125 is an apocalyptic number.
42226102125 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (45) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
42226102125 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (35975394963).
42226102125 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
42226102125 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3556 (or 3543 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3840, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 42226102125 its reverse (52120162224), we get a palindrome (94346264349).
The spelling of 42226102125 in words is "forty-two billion, two hundred twenty-six million, one hundred two thousand, one hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.089 sec. • engine limits •