Search a number
-
+
4345242479 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000000101111111…
…10010001101101111
3102012211100012002122
410002333302031233
532344340224404
61555101343155
7212451644264
oct40277621557
912184305078
104345242479
11192a859a96
12a13267abb
135433002c6
142d314326b
151a671e3be
hex102ff236f

4345242479 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 4345242480. Its totient is φ = 4345242478.

The previous prime is 4345242467. The next prime is 4345242481. The reversal of 4345242479 is 9742425434.

It is a happy number.

4345242479 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 4345242479 - 216 = 4345176943 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×43452424792 = 37762264402612130882, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 4345242481, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (4345247479) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2172621239 + 2172621240.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2172621240).

Almost surely, 24345242479 is an apocalyptic number.

4345242479 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

4345242479 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

4345242479 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 967680, while the sum is 44.

The square root of 4345242479 is about 65918.4532509676. The cubic root of 4345242479 is about 1631.8165702335.

The spelling of 4345242479 in words is "four billion, three hundred forty-five million, two hundred forty-two thousand, four hundred seventy-nine".