Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100000111100… |
… | …1100100111001 |
3 | 10112122102010201 |
4 | 3001321210321 |
5 | 101003022000 |
6 | 5013242201 |
7 | 1155021220 |
oct | 301714471 |
9 | 115572121 |
10 | 50829625 |
11 | 26768060 |
12 | 15033361 |
13 | a6b8c02 |
14 | 6a71cb7 |
15 | 46e096a |
hex | 3079939 |
50829625 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 79103232. Its totient is φ = 31680000.
The previous prime is 50829619. The next prime is 50829629. The reversal of 50829625 is 52692805.
It is a happy number.
50829625 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 50829625 - 25 = 50829593 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (50829629) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 6985 + ... + 12265.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2471976).
Almost surely, 250829625 is an apocalyptic number.
50829625 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
50829625 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (28273607).
50829625 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
50829625 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5314 (or 5304 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 43200, while the sum is 37.
The square root of 50829625 is about 7129.4898134439. The cubic root of 50829625 is about 370.4295595373.
The spelling of 50829625 in words is "fifty million, eight hundred twenty-nine thousand, six hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •