Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110100101001001010… |
… | …011011010011110000 |
3 | 12101220100002100120222 |
4 | 310221022123103300 |
5 | 1411230421032000 |
6 | 41544534352212 |
7 | 4040514023441 |
oct | 645112332360 |
9 | 171810070528 |
10 | 56525174000 |
11 | 21a76a94939 |
12 | ab561bb668 |
13 | 543a896029 |
14 | 2a431a92c8 |
15 | 170c669a85 |
hex | d2929b4f0 |
56525174000 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 137172637056. Its totient is φ = 22528224000.
The previous prime is 56525173997. The next prime is 56525174039. The reversal of 56525174000 is 47152565.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (80).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 502985 + ... + 605015.
Almost surely, 256525174000 is an apocalyptic number.
56525174000 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (50) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 56525174000, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (68586318528).
56525174000 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (80647463056).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
56525174000 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
56525174000 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 102331 (or 102315 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 42000, while the sum is 35.
The spelling of 56525174000 in words is "fifty-six billion, five hundred twenty-five million, one hundred seventy-four thousand".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •