Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1111000011010… |
… | …1000110100101 |
3 | 11101210102220210 |
4 | 3300311012211 |
5 | 112130211234 |
6 | 10133050033 |
7 | 1364420340 |
oct | 360650645 |
9 | 141712823 |
10 | 63132069 |
11 | 32700070 |
12 | 19186919 |
13 | 10105770 |
14 | 8555457 |
15 | 5820be9 |
hex | 3c351a5 |
63132069 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 113025024. Its totient is φ = 30271680.
The previous prime is 63132059. The next prime is 63132071. The reversal of 63132069 is 96023136.
It is a happy number.
63132069 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-63132069 is a prime.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×631320693 (a number of 24 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (63132059) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 7509 + ... + 13514.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3532032).
Almost surely, 263132069 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
63132069 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (49892955).
63132069 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
63132069 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 21057.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5832, while the sum is 30.
The square root of 63132069 is about 7945.5691426102. The cubic root of 63132069 is about 398.1835743974.
The spelling of 63132069 in words is "sixty-three million, one hundred thirty-two thousand, sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •