Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100000010000001111… |
… | …1100110001000000000 |
3 | 20121210011121210020202 |
4 | 1000200133212020000 |
5 | 2113323221132042 |
6 | 51453021224332 |
7 | 5001304433405 |
oct | 1004037461000 |
9 | 217704553222 |
10 | 69264630272 |
11 | 274140949a2 |
12 | 115107020a8 |
13 | 66baca3136 |
14 | 34d10b22ac |
15 | 1c05ca3632 |
hex | 10207e6200 |
69264630272 has 160 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 157852468224. Its totient is φ = 30169497600.
The previous prime is 69264630199. The next prime is 69264630277. The reversal of 69264630272 is 27203646296.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (69264630277) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 6200372 + ... + 6211532.
Almost surely, 269264630272 is an apocalyptic number.
69264630272 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (62) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 69264630272, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (78926234112).
69264630272 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (88587837952).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
69264630272 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
69264630272 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 11250 (or 11234 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1306368, while the sum is 47.
The spelling of 69264630272 in words is "sixty-nine billion, two hundred sixty-four million, six hundred thirty thousand, two hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.134 sec. • engine limits •