Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101000010100101110… |
… | …1100110001000010100 |
3 | 22021111221201021021000 |
4 | 1100221131212020110 |
5 | 2404321303021012 |
6 | 103440422423300 |
7 | 6153622046526 |
oct | 1205135461024 |
9 | 267457637230 |
10 | 86594970132 |
11 | 337a766a820 |
12 | 14948591b30 |
13 | 8220557bc8 |
14 | 42969c1a16 |
15 | 23bc47dddc |
hex | 1429766214 |
86594970132 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 245014640640. Its totient is φ = 26230232160.
The previous prime is 86594970127. The next prime is 86594970151. The reversal of 86594970132 is 23107949568.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (54).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3202453 + ... + 3229379.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2552235840).
It is a 1-persistent number, because it is pandigital, but 2⋅86594970132 = 173189940264 is not.
Almost surely, 286594970132 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 86594970132, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (122507320320).
86594970132 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (158419670508).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
86594970132 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
86594970132 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 29658 (or 29650 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3265920, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 86594970132 in words is "eighty-six billion, five hundred ninety-four million, nine hundred seventy thousand, one hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •