Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101011101100000101… |
… | …0011010000111101011 |
3 | 22222011112121120101222 |
4 | 1113120022122013223 |
5 | 3014121123422144 |
6 | 111033431532255 |
7 | 6530653443611 |
oct | 1273012320753 |
9 | 288145546358 |
10 | 93820920299 |
11 | 36875511067 |
12 | 1622452a08b |
13 | 8b02602972 |
14 | 47805576b1 |
15 | 2691a2b2ee |
hex | 15d829a1eb |
93820920299 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 93820920300. Its totient is φ = 93820920298.
The previous prime is 93820920233. The next prime is 93820920301. The reversal of 93820920299 is 99202902839.
It is a happy number.
It is a strong prime.
It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (99202902839) is a distict prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 93820920299 - 232 = 89525953003 is a prime.
It is a Sophie Germain prime.
Together with 93820920301, it forms a pair of twin primes.
It is a Chen prime.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 93820920299.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (93820920209) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 46910460149 + 46910460150.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (46910460150).
Almost surely, 293820920299 is an apocalyptic number.
93820920299 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
93820920299 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
93820920299 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1259712, while the sum is 53.
The spelling of 93820920299 in words is "ninety-three billion, eight hundred twenty million, nine hundred twenty thousand, two hundred ninety-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •