Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111001001110111… |
… | …110001101010000 |
3 | 2110220211112121200 |
4 | 321032332031100 |
5 | 3431304214003 |
6 | 235140551200 |
7 | 32536534041 |
oct | 7116761520 |
9 | 2426745550 |
10 | 960226128 |
11 | 453028114 |
12 | 2296b2500 |
13 | 123c22554 |
14 | 917568c8 |
15 | 594766a3 |
hex | 393be350 |
960226128 has 30 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2687299914. Its totient is φ = 320075328.
The previous prime is 960226097. The next prime is 960226129. The reversal of 960226128 is 821622069.
It is a happy number.
960226128 is a `hidden beast` number, since 9 + 602 + 26 + 1 + 28 = 666.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 546998544 + 413227584 = 23388^2 + 20328^2 .
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 960226092 and 960226101.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (960226129) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 3333975 + ... + 3334262.
Almost surely, 2960226128 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
960226128 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1727073786).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
960226128 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
960226128 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 6668251 (or 6668242 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 20736, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 960226128 is about 30987.5156797056. The cubic root of 960226128 is about 986.5622791520.
The spelling of 960226128 in words is "nine hundred sixty million, two hundred twenty-six thousand, one hundred twenty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •