Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001000110001001011010… |
… | …1001000001010111100000 |
3 | 1022102002212121022122020101 |
4 | 2101202112221001113200 |
5 | 2302324440031412432 |
6 | 33134254253152144 |
7 | 2051364223363444 |
oct | 221422651012740 |
9 | 38362777278211 |
10 | 10001211200992 |
11 | 3206542aa0280 |
12 | 115637548b654 |
13 | 5771580720bb |
14 | 2680bdd36824 |
15 | 12524b4424e7 |
hex | 91896a415e0 |
10001211200992 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 22177035546624. Its totient is φ = 4400203852800.
The previous prime is 10001211200989. The next prime is 10001211201001. The reversal of 10001211200992 is 29900211210001.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 10001211200992.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 895438 + ... + 4561165.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (231010786944).
Almost surely, 210001211200992 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
10001211200992 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (12175824345632).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10001211200992 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10001211200992 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5456792 (or 5456784 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 648, while the sum is 28.
Adding to 10001211200992 its reverse (29900211210001), we get a palindrome (39901422410993).
The spelling of 10001211200992 in words is "ten trillion, one billion, two hundred eleven million, two hundred thousand, nine hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •