Search a number
-
+
127008029 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1111001000111…
…11110100011101
322211222200021002
413210133310131
5230003224104
620334120045
73101356541
oct744376435
9284880232
10127008029
1165769015
1236650025
132040b9a5
1412c21a21
15b23c01e
hex791fd1d

127008029 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 127008030. Its totient is φ = 127008028.

The previous prime is 127007987. The next prime is 127008031. The reversal of 127008029 is 920800721.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 84732025 + 42276004 = 9205^2 + 6502^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 127008029 - 28 = 127007773 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1270080292 = 32262078860929682, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 127008031, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 127007992 and 127008010.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (127008059) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 63504014 + 63504015.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (63504015).

Almost surely, 2127008029 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

127008029 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

127008029 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

127008029 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2016, while the sum is 29.

The square root of 127008029 is about 11269.7838932253. The cubic root of 127008029 is about 502.6631619524.

The spelling of 127008029 in words is "one hundred twenty-seven million, eight thousand, twenty-nine".