Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011111010001010… |
… | …0001011100000000 |
3 | 22020210012020200020 |
4 | 2332202201130000 |
5 | 23021330032041 |
6 | 1245112453440 |
7 | 142134451665 |
oct | 27642413400 |
9 | 8223166606 |
10 | 3196720896 |
11 | 13a05137a6 |
12 | 7526aa280 |
13 | 3bc391135 |
14 | 2247b3a6c |
15 | 13a9a1866 |
hex | be8a1700 |
3196720896 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 8548694784. Its totient is φ = 1060469760.
The previous prime is 3196720867. The next prime is 3196720909. The reversal of 3196720896 is 6980276913.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 152185 + ... + 171911.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (118731872).
Almost surely, 23196720896 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 3196720896, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (4274347392).
3196720896 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (5351973888).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3196720896 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3196720896 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 19957 (or 19943 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 979776, while the sum is 51.
The square root of 3196720896 is about 56539.5516077020. The cubic root of 3196720896 is about 1473.1090806607.
The spelling of 3196720896 in words is "three billion, one hundred ninety-six million, seven hundred twenty thousand, eight hundred ninety-six".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •