Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100101110000100010000011… |
… | …0010010011010000101100101 |
3 | 1121112221220022022100201111020 |
4 | 1023201010012102122011211 |
5 | 322013021243132134000 |
6 | 3134212224144001353 |
7 | 126646166523035601 |
oct | 11341040622320545 |
9 | 1545856268321436 |
10 | 332125631521125 |
11 | 96909764550672 |
12 | 3130020a000259 |
13 | 1134240ac053c0 |
14 | 5c02d758aa501 |
15 | 285e53abb9ba0 |
hex | 12e110649a165 |
332125631521125 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 595178471876352. Its totient is φ = 163505437228800.
The previous prime is 332125631521069. The next prime is 332125631521199. The reversal of 332125631521125 is 521125136521233.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 332125631521125 - 28 = 332125631520869 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3321256315211252 (a number of 30 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 331257822 + ... + 332258928.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (9299663623068).
Almost surely, 2332125631521125 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
332125631521125 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (263052840355227).
332125631521125 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
332125631521125 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1069191 (or 1069181 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 324000, while the sum is 42.
The spelling of 332125631521125 in words is "three hundred thirty-two trillion, one hundred twenty-five billion, six hundred thirty-one million, five hundred twenty-one thousand, one hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •